Author

Nur Mohamad Kasim

Subject

- Ilmu Sosial

Abstract

of winning party. Basically verdict can ask for execution because the nature is condemtoir or judgment. Execution essentially is a legal effort to realize the obligation of losing side in a case to meet the achievements listed in court judgment. However, there are times when execution may not run smoothly. Many obstacles, in form of physical resistance on losing party that reached the non-fulfillment of orders granting bail, decided by judge under uitvoerbaar bij voorraad decision (decision to run first). It can create disputes and claims of other parties. The decision of BASYARNAS should be accepted tjy all parties. Departing from the above description, authors will examine tire Verdict Execution of National Sltaria Aibitration Board (BASYARNAS) in Indonesia Positive Law and BASYARNAS Competence to resolve the disputes between Islamic banking with parties involved in agreement. From the background of above problems and the title, author raises the issue as follows: How Execution Verdict of National Sharia Aibitration Board In Indonesia Positive law? And How Authority of National Sltaria Aibitration Board (BASYARNAS) to resolve the disputes?

Publisher

Internasional Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)

Contributor

-

Publish

2016

Material Type

-

Right

-